David Mesiar
I contacted AA to determine whether it was possible to drain and refill the CVT (continuously variable transmission) in my 2014 Subaru Outback with 97,500 miles. They quoted $300 for the service, but said they would check a sample of the fluid prior to replacing it, and if it was found to be too dirty or containing pieces they would not advise the service as it could result in driveability issues. All consistent with what I had read. They did not mention use of a proprietary Subaru software tool that resets the transmission and makes it “relearn” its shifting ability. The tech took a sample and advised not to do the service due to rather large particles he observed in the sample. He also advised that the antifreeze was low and that stopleak product had been added, and the rear brakes were down to 3mm. I’ve owned this vehicle since new. There are no leaks of antifreeze and no additives have been put in the system. i paid the roughly $100 service charge and spoke with Folks at the Subaru dealership. They advise transmission service between 50 and 100K miles. They performed the service, noted zero pieces or chunks in the fluid, refilled it, ran the relearn program, and it all works just fine. Cost was $550. They also checked brake wear and told me both front and rear brakes are at 6mm, twice as much as AA’s tech reported. Being wrong on 1 of 3 items would maybe be forgiveable, but being wrong on 3 of 3 items tells me this tech does not know what he or she is doing. Was this a way to generate unneeded service revenue? Are the techs paid based on how much they generate in earnings? Your customers, especially those unable to verify your diagnoses, should be able to trust that you are only recommending necessary work. Taking advantage of the less mechanically inclined is not ok. Come on AA, fix this.